AI can help identify the most discriminatory dissolution medium by determining which medium best distinguishes meaningful formulation or process differences while maintaining scientifically appropriate drug release.
1. Generate disso data
Test the reference product and development formulations in several media, for example:
→ 0.1 N HCl
→ pH 1.2 buffer
→ pH 4.5 acetate buffer
→ pH 6.8 phosphate buffer
→ Water
→ Media containing different surfactant concentrations
Include formulations with deliberate variables such as:
→ API PSD
→ Excipient level or grade
→ Granulation parameters
→ Compression force
→ Coating level
→ Release-controlling polymer concentration
2. Prepare the AI dataset
Prepare the AI dataset so that each row represents one formulation–medium–time combination. Include medium pH, surfactant type and concentration, API particle size, polymer or excipient level, compression force and formulation category as inputs. Record the percentage dissolved at each sampling time, and calculate profile-level responses such as dissolution rate, dissolution efficiency, similarity factor (f₂), profile distance, and time to 50% and 80% release. Where available, include known performance classifications, such as acceptable, borderline or unacceptable.
3. Build prediction models
Potential models include:
→ Random Forest
→ XGBoost
→ Artificial Neural Network
→ Support Vector Machine
→ Partial Least Squares
Model selection depend on dataset size and complexity. For limited data, start with simpler statistical models and compare their performance with machine-learning methods.
Keep all observations from the same batch together during model validation to prevent data leakage.
4. Calculate discriminatory performance
For every medium, evaluate:
→ Differences in dissolution at each time point
→ f₂ between reference and modified formulations, where applicable
→ Dissolution efficiency
→ Time to 50% and 80% release
→ Area between dissolution profiles
→ Within-batch variability
→ Correct rank ordering of formulation changes
An exploratory discrimination score can reward meaningful between-formulation differences and consistent rank ordering while penalising excessive variability. Any scoring weights should be justified; this is not a standard regulatory acceptance criterion.
5. Select and confirm the medium
The selected medium should:
→ Distinguish formulations containing meaningful changes
→ Correctly rank acceptable, borderline and intentionally poor formulations
→ Avoid excessively rapid release that masks differences
→ Produce acceptable variability
→ Remain scientifically justifiable
→ Ideally demonstrate relevance to BE or product performance
Confirm the selected medium experimentally using independent batches and assess method robustness.
AI supports the selection of a discriminatory medium—it does not replace experimental confirmation or scientific judgement.
Related Certification Course: AI & Machine Learning in Drug Development
Related Certification Course: AI & Machine Learning in Drug Development

